Timeline for Do we want to be a high-voting site?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 16, 2017 at 16:02 | history | edited | CommunityBot | replaced http://meta.tex.stackexchange.com/ with https://tex.meta.stackexchange.com/ | |
| Mar 26, 2013 at 13:10 | vote | accept | WilliamKF | ||
| Mar 26, 2013 at 12:45 | answer | added | asheeshr | timeline score: 3 | |
| Mar 22, 2013 at 14:22 | comment | added | Ken Bellows | I think it's reasonable to assume that private beta users are more likely to read and participate in Meta. The very fact that they are involved in a private beta suggests that they have both an understanding of and an interest in the internal workings of SE, or at least a better understanding and more interest than the average user who has never been a part of a private beta. (IMO.) | |
| Mar 21, 2013 at 1:04 | comment | added | Igor Skochinsky Mod | "which hopefully read meta at a higher rate than your typical users". I like your optimism :) | |
| Mar 20, 2013 at 23:31 | answer | added | Gilles 'SO- stop being evil' | timeline score: 7 | |
| Mar 20, 2013 at 23:16 | comment | added | WilliamKF | The users participating in the private beta set the stage for later users. If we set the standard of voting high, later when the public beta opens, the new users will see a pattern of high votes and naturally follow suit, without reading meta. Hence this plea is to the private beta users, which hopefully read meta at a higher rate than your typical users. | |
| Mar 20, 2013 at 23:09 | comment | added | Igor Skochinsky Mod | I'm not sure how are you going to influence that anyway. 90% of the users likely don't read meta, so even if you post appeals to vote more or vote less, they're unlikely to have much effect. | |
| Mar 20, 2013 at 22:36 | history | asked | WilliamKF | CC BY-SA 3.0 |