Edit - Reverse Engineering Stack Exchange

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

Required fields*

Rev

really all this is sesnseless and nothing give. assume thread execute instructions in place where we apply patch . say push rbp; /** interrupt **/ sub rsp,10 let thread X executed push rbp and then clock interrupt , from where already we return on another thread in another place. then you apply patch (say set jmp here ) and then thread X continue execution from place where it was interrupted. already inside jmp instruction. and even without thread swap - you interrupt thread by DPC - but to where thread returned after DPC ? without change thread context - all this senseless

RbMm
– RbMm

2023-01-26 05:47:43 +00:00
Commented Jan 26, 2023 at 5:47

Add a comment |

Correct minor typos or mistakes
Clarify meaning without changing it
Add related resources or links
Always respect the author’s intent
Don’t use edits to reply to the author

create code fences with backticks ` or tildes ~
```
like so
```
add language identifier to highlight code
```python
def function(foo):
print(foo)
```
put returns between paragraphs
for linebreak add 2 spaces at end
_italic_ or **bold**
indent code by 4 spaces
backtick escapes `like _so_`
quote by placing > at start of line
to make links (use https whenever possible)

<https://example.com>

[example](https://example.com)

<a href="https://example.com">example</a>

formatting help »
answering help »