Skip to main content
added 27 characters in body
Source Link
KorvinStarmast
  • 146.3k
  • 1
  • 38
  • 76
  1. It looked to become another source of argument

    It looked to become another source of argument

  2. The badly veiled insult to both my intent and my integrity was taken as a sign that some people don't want my help.

    The badly veiled insult to both my intent and my integrity was taken as a sign that some people don't want my help.

  1. It looked to become another source of argument
  2. The badly veiled insult to both my intent and my integrity was taken as a sign that some people don't want my help.
  1. It looked to become another source of argument

  2. The badly veiled insult to both my intent and my integrity was taken as a sign that some people don't want my help.

replaced http://meta.rpg.stackexchange.com/ with https://rpg.meta.stackexchange.com/
Source Link

I already posted one month's worth of data and assessment from the last year's use of the tag. Until we complete @doppelgreener's very sound suggestion on analyzing the last year's RAW questionscomplete @doppelgreener's very sound suggestion on analyzing the last year's RAW questions to see what patterns of use have shown, any proposal risks overlooking actual usage and take on the form of tampering. (I am using Deming's meaning of that in terms of process change).

1 per @nitsua60's comment: the most votes ever for a question on meta was 46ever for a question on meta was 46

I already posted one month's worth of data and assessment from the last year's use of the tag. Until we complete @doppelgreener's very sound suggestion on analyzing the last year's RAW questions to see what patterns of use have shown, any proposal risks overlooking actual usage and take on the form of tampering. (I am using Deming's meaning of that in terms of process change).

1 per @nitsua60's comment: the most votes ever for a question on meta was 46

I already posted one month's worth of data and assessment from the last year's use of the tag. Until we complete @doppelgreener's very sound suggestion on analyzing the last year's RAW questions to see what patterns of use have shown, any proposal risks overlooking actual usage and take on the form of tampering. (I am using Deming's meaning of that in terms of process change).

1 per @nitsua60's comment: the most votes ever for a question on meta was 46

added 394 characters in body
Source Link
KorvinStarmast
  • 146.3k
  • 1
  • 38
  • 76

Follow up: after the negative feedback from two of the principles in the argument, my second month's of (of 12 total) for grinding away on RAW questions was abandoned: the reasons for throwing up my hands is twofold.

  1. It looked to become another source of argument
  2. The badly veiled insult to both my intent and my integrity was taken as a sign that some people don't want my help.

Follow up: after the negative feedback from two of the principles in the argument, my second month's of (of 12 total) for grinding away on RAW questions was abandoned: the reasons for throwing up my hands is twofold.

  1. It looked to become another source of argument
  2. The badly veiled insult to both my intent and my integrity was taken as a sign that some people don't want my help.
added 60 characters in body
Source Link
KorvinStarmast
  • 146.3k
  • 1
  • 38
  • 76
Loading
added 45 characters in body
Source Link
KorvinStarmast
  • 146.3k
  • 1
  • 38
  • 76
Loading
added 211 characters in body
Source Link
KorvinStarmast
  • 146.3k
  • 1
  • 38
  • 76
Loading
Source Link
KorvinStarmast
  • 146.3k
  • 1
  • 38
  • 76
Loading