Skip to main content

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

15
  • 7
    \$\begingroup\$ Nice answer. And yeah, air is not a visible phenomenon. \$\endgroup\$ Commented Jul 31, 2017 at 14:38
  • 2
    \$\begingroup\$ "which would require precise calculations from the caster" which of course the magic takes care of for you \$\endgroup\$ Commented Jul 31, 2017 at 21:05
  • 9
    \$\begingroup\$ @Szega it's an illusion - it's not much good if it can't "Illude" people. The "image" of an object must look like the object under different lighting conditions and different points of view otherwise it is not the image of the object. \$\endgroup\$ Commented Jul 31, 2017 at 23:45
  • 4
    \$\begingroup\$ @Szega sorry, what's a "photon"? - creatures see by means of magical rays that shoot out from their eyes \$\endgroup\$ Commented Aug 1, 2017 at 8:55
  • 3
    \$\begingroup\$ We can cut this short: Does the spell description state, that there are limitations in regard to multiple perspectives/angles/distances/etc? If no, then there are no such limitations. End of story. I have seen this play out dozens of times and it never works. Someone claims that THIS single, randomly chosen "problem" must be considered for the magic, because... well, because the person bringing this up thinks it's important. It never is. It's magic. It's work as described. You are free to design an optics-compatible illusion magic system if you want that kind of thing. But this isn't it. \$\endgroup\$ Commented Aug 1, 2017 at 10:00