Skip to main content

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

5
  • 5
    \$\begingroup\$ While I like the idea honestly, I think DnD is on the easier side of systems. Compared to Shadowrun or The Dark Eye (probably not known outside of Germany?) it's really not overly complex. I feel like you can play DnD quite simplistic and add more advanced features like combat maneuvers, skill usage, saves and so on over time. \$\endgroup\$ Commented Apr 24, 2018 at 19:14
  • 2
    \$\begingroup\$ Also we kinda already learned a lot about the system, I don't think I can convince them at this point to... just start over with something completely different. \$\endgroup\$ Commented Apr 24, 2018 at 19:18
  • 4
    \$\begingroup\$ Moving from a system one person knows to a system that nobody knows doesn't seem like a positive step, however easy the system is to learn. \$\endgroup\$ Commented Apr 24, 2018 at 23:09
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ @Ben DnD5E is surely on the easy-medium side of the game systems. Wouldn't say easiest system ever as there are RPGs made to start playing within 20 minutes of reading, but yeah. \$\endgroup\$ Commented Apr 25, 2018 at 3:44
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ Learning a system as simple as Fate, in my experience, is less of an obstacle for learning common GM skills than someone having difficulty with the mechanics of a given system. Your issue, as I understand it, is with common GM skills, which playing a few sessions of Fate would fix. If you're dead set against learning a new system, the next best thing is to, as you said, simply play a rules-light version of 5E until the DM gets enough of a bearing to introduce more rules. \$\endgroup\$ Commented Apr 25, 2018 at 16:58