Timeline for What is considered a class feature for a monster for the purpose of Change Shape?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
11 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 8, 2021 at 13:14 | history | edited | KorvinStarmast | CC BY-SA 4.0 | added 23 characters in body |
| May 23, 2019 at 19:04 | comment | added | Foo Bar | I think this approach probably isn't RAW, but as a non-AL DM I would consider using it as a house rule. | |
| May 22, 2019 at 14:32 | comment | added | GcL | @NautArch unless it's effects. Those are considered the same if they have the same name. | |
| May 21, 2019 at 18:58 | history | edited | Rubiksmoose | CC BY-SA 4.0 | edited body |
| May 21, 2019 at 18:22 | comment | added | NotArch | My point is, we don't know. But keeping the door open is something they've done before. Assuming that things that are similar, but have different names, are the same is not usually done. | |
| May 21, 2019 at 18:22 | history | edited | Pink Sweetener | CC BY-SA 4.0 | deleted 43 characters in body |
| May 21, 2019 at 18:21 | comment | added | Pink Sweetener | @NautArch good point I'll remove that example. | |
| May 21, 2019 at 18:20 | comment | added | Pink Sweetener | @NautArch What could possibly be more of a class feature than the monster statblocks that are named after classes with nearly exactly the same abilities? I'm trying to imagine what this future source could look like and I can't come up with anything that looks different from Volo's. | |
| May 21, 2019 at 18:18 | comment | added | NotArch | By not specifying Spellcasting and keeping it general, they could also just be keeping the door open for future monsters with actual class features besides spellcasting. | |
| May 21, 2019 at 18:18 | history | edited | Pink Sweetener | CC BY-SA 4.0 | deleted 445 characters in body |
| May 21, 2019 at 18:13 | history | answered | Pink Sweetener | CC BY-SA 4.0 |