Skip to main content

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

Required fields*

5
  • \$\begingroup\$ I'm not sure how the first line (the header) relates to the content. It makes sense, but then it seems you give absolute analysis... \$\endgroup\$ Commented Aug 14, 2019 at 21:42
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ @mattdm The problem I am dealing with is that since OP has not decided, I have to cover more than one best fit. Otherwise, I'd only have picked on for each, and likely have recommended a final two. \$\endgroup\$ Commented Aug 14, 2019 at 22:05
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ @mattdm I honestly like the answer that suggests the UA/sidekicks, but the OP is not the DM and has advised us that the PC/no sub class is the way they are going. \$\endgroup\$ Commented Aug 15, 2019 at 2:54
  • \$\begingroup\$ Yes I like that one too :) but I also appreciate what you're doing here. However, I still can't see how "Best Fit" depends on your two PCs: the ones with sub classes applied to the lists you give. \$\endgroup\$ Commented Aug 15, 2019 at 6:28
  • \$\begingroup\$ @mattdm OK, what title would you suggest to make a better fit for the content? This may be a case where as I developed the answer, I wandered from my topic statement a little bit. \$\endgroup\$ Commented Aug 15, 2019 at 14:06