Timeline for What level, if any, of feedback should players give a new GM?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
4 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 28, 2021 at 15:08 | comment | added | Falco | Good answer - like criticizing anyone for anything: Don't stress too many points at once, don't "collect" everything you don't like and never generalize. Always focus on a specific thing you didn't like in a specific instance and present it politely not too long after it happened. | |
| Apr 27, 2021 at 16:16 | comment | added | Poseidaan | @IsaacMiddlemiss depending on the type of DM, the player specifying arcana might actually be a disadvantage. If the DM decided an investigation check could be used to discover the dagger was coated in something, followed by nature to deduce that it was poisoned but the player had chosen to ask specifically for an arcana check, they'd miss on this important fact, if thay had simply said they wished to inspect the dagger, the DM could have had them roll investigation. | |
| Apr 27, 2021 at 3:03 | comment | added | Isaac Middlemiss | In the instance of the amulet, once they had done that the player was unhappy with the result and said "OK now I want to do an Investigation check", followed by a Nature check, trying to get all their top skills in. I get what you're saying though. | |
| Apr 27, 2021 at 2:16 | history | answered | Dan B | CC BY-SA 4.0 |