Skip to main content
Role-playing Games

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

4
  • \$\begingroup\$ This is the same conclusion I was leaning toward, but was hoping to find a concrete rule disallowing it. \$\endgroup\$ Commented Apr 29, 2011 at 0:55
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ No, that is the concrete rule. This has an explicit "GM common sense" line that emphasises rule 0. Amusingly, this recursive move isn't very useful for a warlord, even one with a reach weapon. It can be incredibly broken for a ranger or other melee striker though. However, as it's been around for ages and hasn't reached any kind of "broken" status with builds, I wouldn't worry too much about it. It's a great great way to get horribly out of position, and tricky to take tactical advantage of. Let us know how its use, unrestricted, turns out. \$\endgroup\$ Commented Apr 29, 2011 at 1:48
  • \$\begingroup\$ There's actually a bug(?) in the online character builder that prints this path feature as When you end your movement **within** 2 squares of an enemy. That's much easier to abuse, and why it came up during play. \$\endgroup\$ Commented Apr 29, 2011 at 13:35
  • \$\begingroup\$ oh. Yeah. That's... that's a lot more useful. \$\endgroup\$ Commented Apr 29, 2011 at 13:37