Skip to main content

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

Required fields*

3
  • $\begingroup$ I lost you at the third equation. Why do you need to solve a generalized eigenvalue problem to compute the eigenvectors and eigenvalues of a Hermitian matrix? What's wrong with a normal eigensolver? Where did that S pop out of? $\endgroup$ Commented Jun 15, 2018 at 14:01
  • $\begingroup$ The reason why a generalized EVP has to be solved is intrinsic to this problem, I should have said that. It has a physical background: basically, the Schrödinger eqn. is solved for the case that the ansatz wave function is represented via a non-orthogonal basis set $\{\phi_i\}$. This yields the overlap matrix $S_{ij}=\langle\psi_i|\psi_j\rangle$. $\endgroup$ Commented Jun 15, 2018 at 14:28
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ So what is the function that you really have to compute? It's not the one in the first equation, is it? Where does $S$ appear in it? $\endgroup$ Commented Jun 15, 2018 at 14:29