Skip to main content
10 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Nov 6, 2017 at 17:16 comment added Denis Im glad this is heating up in the community now.
Jul 28, 2016 at 10:33 history edited user15194 CC BY-SA 3.0
added 145 characters in body
Jul 28, 2016 at 10:31 comment added user15194 @horsedrowner news.ycombinator.com/item?id=6165708
Jul 28, 2016 at 10:21 comment added Vivelin I can't find it back anymore, but I remember seeing a Chrome dev state that they did not implement encryption using a master password because it would give the user a false sense of security.
Jul 28, 2016 at 9:39 comment added user15194 @Qwertylicious can they? Sure the they can. Do they want to? Not likely, otherwise it would have been done already. Anyway, that's already out of the scope of stackexchange unless someone who works in Chrome development shows up :P
Jul 28, 2016 at 8:57 comment added Denis Hmm.. can't chrome developers find a different solution to this? I like the way Firefox has implemented their encryption
Jul 28, 2016 at 8:41 comment added deviantfan @Qwertylicious Right, that's why people should trust software they install... (or not install it)
Jul 28, 2016 at 7:52 vote accept Denis
Jul 28, 2016 at 7:51 comment added Denis Thank you for this answer. This means, I can simply write a software and it can be handed over to a person with the request to install. And when that person does install it, I can get all the beautifully combinations of usernames and passwords very easilly. I think this is a risk and may be somone can exploit it.
Jul 28, 2016 at 7:33 history answered user15194 CC BY-SA 3.0