Timeline for How to safely view a malicious PDF?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S Feb 16, 2023 at 22:24 | history | suggested | SevenSidedDie | CC BY-SA 4.0 | fix list formatting to display as post author intended; remove a "simply" duplicate |
| Feb 16, 2023 at 19:05 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Feb 16, 2023 at 22:24 | |||||
| Jun 23, 2017 at 22:38 | history | edited | barbecue | CC BY-SA 3.0 | Explain in more detail specific features which can be exploited in some viewers |
| Jun 22, 2017 at 7:18 | comment | added | Dmitry Grigoryev | There's no need to be rude. I did read your answer in full, yet I fail to see what makes Sumatra so special. There are plenty of PDF viewers which either don't support JS or let the user disable it. | |
| Jun 21, 2017 at 15:04 | comment | added | barbecue | @DmitryGrigoryev My reasons for thinking this are clearly stated in my answer. I recommend re-reading the first paragraph and looking at the link in the second paragraph. You will find your answers there. | |
| Jun 21, 2017 at 10:37 | comment | added | Dmitry Grigoryev | What makes you think Sumatra is safer than any of the 1001 other PDF viewers out there? | |
| Feb 18, 2017 at 20:01 | review | First posts | |||
| Feb 18, 2017 at 20:07 | |||||
| Feb 18, 2017 at 19:53 | history | answered | barbecue | CC BY-SA 3.0 |