Skip to main content
Removed fluff. Fixed grammar.
Source Link
RoraΖ
  • 12.5k
  • 4
  • 54
  • 84

I havinghave been doing systems development for years starting with Basic and Cobol, then dBase III+, VB6, Asp.Net using Access, and SQL Server. I am also a CISSP.
I

I think he should learn assembly language. Though it may sound irrevelantirrelevant, it will give him a strong foundation in reverse engineering and also help him to understand the basis of C, C++ etc.
When When source code is not available, then after reverse engineering what you will have is assembly.

I having been doing systems development for years starting with Basic and Cobol, then dBase III+, VB6, Asp.Net using Access, and SQL Server. I am also a CISSP.
I think he should learn assembly language. Though it may sound irrevelant, it will give him a strong foundation in reverse engineering and also help him to understand the basis of C, C++ etc.
When source code is not available, then after reverse engineering what you will have is assembly.

I have been doing systems development for years starting with Basic and Cobol, then dBase III+, VB6, Asp.Net using Access, and SQL Server. I am also a CISSP.

I think he should learn assembly language. Though it may sound irrelevant, it will give him a strong foundation in reverse engineering and also help him to understand the basis of C, C++ etc. When source code is not available, then after reverse engineering what you will have is assembly.

I just signed up at this site. I having been doing systems development for years starting with Basic and cobolCobol, then dbase iii+dBase III+, vb6VB6, aspAsp.netNet using accessAccess, sql serverand SQL Server. I am also a CISSP. I
I think he should learn assembly language. Though it willmay sound unrevelantirrevelant, it will give him a strong foundation in reverse engineering and also help him to understand the basis of C, c++C++ etc. When a
When source code is not available, then after reverse engineering what you will have is assembly.I am currently learning assembly language nasm and I enjoy it except the hexadecimal conversion which is boring.

I just signed up at this site. I having doing systems development for years starting with Basic and cobol, then dbase iii+, vb6, asp.net using access, sql server. I am also a CISSP. I think he should learn assembly language. Though it will sound unrevelant, it will give him a strong foundation in reverse engineering and also help him to understand the basis of C, c++ etc. When a source code is not available, then after reverse engineering what you will have is assembly.I am currently learning assembly language nasm and I enjoy it except the hexadecimal conversion which is boring.

I having been doing systems development for years starting with Basic and Cobol, then dBase III+, VB6, Asp.Net using Access, and SQL Server. I am also a CISSP.
I think he should learn assembly language. Though it may sound irrevelant, it will give him a strong foundation in reverse engineering and also help him to understand the basis of C, C++ etc.
When source code is not available, then after reverse engineering what you will have is assembly.

Source Link

I just signed up at this site. I having doing systems development for years starting with Basic and cobol, then dbase iii+, vb6, asp.net using access, sql server. I am also a CISSP. I think he should learn assembly language. Though it will sound unrevelant, it will give him a strong foundation in reverse engineering and also help him to understand the basis of C, c++ etc. When a source code is not available, then after reverse engineering what you will have is assembly.I am currently learning assembly language nasm and I enjoy it except the hexadecimal conversion which is boring.