Skip to main content
24 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Jun 16, 2020 at 9:49 history edited CommunityBot
Commonmark migration
Mar 27, 2020 at 21:23 answer added mti2935 timeline score: 3
S Jun 19, 2019 at 21:03 history bounty ended CommunityBot
S Jun 19, 2019 at 21:03 history notice removed CommunityBot
Jun 12, 2019 at 20:14 answer added user10216038 timeline score: 9
Jun 12, 2019 at 18:30 answer added reed timeline score: 6
Jun 11, 2019 at 19:24 comment added gparyani @BenCrowell I started a bounty on this question.
S Jun 11, 2019 at 19:22 history bounty started gparyani
S Jun 11, 2019 at 19:22 history notice added gparyani Current answers are outdated
Jun 11, 2019 at 15:40 comment added user51881 It would be helpful to have answers with more up to date information. I think the situation has changed quite a bit since this question was asked in 2011. Now, in 2019, it seems pretty standard for newspaper web sites to refuse access if they detect/think you're in private mode. So it may just be a heuristic, but it's no longer hypothetical, it's in common use. I would have liked to offer a bounty for a more recent answer, but apparently the SE software won't let me offer even a small bounty because my rep is only 244.
Jul 3, 2018 at 14:14 history protected CommunityBot
May 26, 2015 at 17:55 comment added racec0ndition If the end goal is to track users, regardless of normal or incognito mode, this might be helpful: radicalresearch.co.uk/lab/hstssupercookies
Jun 8, 2014 at 2:20 answer added D.W. timeline score: 3
May 23, 2014 at 11:32 comment added BlueCacti I'm quite intrested in this. I have configured my browser (Chrome) to delete all userdata when I close it (i.e. cookies, form data (which I don't save anyway), sessions, ...). So I need to re-login every time I closed my browser. I wonder if this would create a false positive for Icognito Modus scanning methods. I also use Incognito quite often when visiting torrents sites and other sites I expect to encounter malware/adware/... I'd also like to know wether some extensions can leak this info, they are not enabled in Incognito Mode tho' (AdBlock+, DoNotTrackMe, HTTPS Everywhere, ...)
May 22, 2014 at 19:23 comment added pseudon Some additional information here: apple.stackexchange.com/questions/131587/… Notably, that specific to Safari under Mavericks, Private Browsing mode does not send requests for favicons, so this could be a vector for discovering whether P.B. is on.
May 13, 2014 at 20:48 answer added EricLaw timeline score: 8
Nov 29, 2011 at 1:31 vote accept D.W.
Nov 28, 2011 at 20:58 answer added bstpierre timeline score: 32
Nov 19, 2011 at 17:09 comment added curiousguy "The background research I've done." +1 The question itself is worth reading. Thank you.
Nov 19, 2011 at 12:33 comment added bstpierre What's the end goal? What can the website achieve by detecting private browsing mode? Which aspect of private browsing is important to you -- cookies, history, cache, etc? What's the difference between private browsing and, say, a throwaway firefox profile? Or using privoxy set to nuke all cookies?
Nov 19, 2011 at 8:21 history tweeted twitter.com/#!/StackSecurity/status/137807654042075137
Nov 19, 2011 at 5:13 history edited D.W. CC BY-SA 3.0
elaborate to make clear that I'm not claiming detecting whether logged into Facebook is a good way to check for private browsing mode
Nov 19, 2011 at 4:02 answer added Sonny Ordell timeline score: 1
Nov 19, 2011 at 3:08 history asked D.W. CC BY-SA 3.0