First I have already searched the help text and seen http://meta.sharepoint.stackexchange.com/questions/864/link-to-my-company-toolLink to my company tool? but the issue that there is a difference between a standard policy and a moderator's opinion and consistency across different moderators' actions. I am saying this as I have recently experienced, in my view, inconsistent reactions from the moderators.
replaced http://meta.sharepoint.stackexchange.com/ with https://sharepoint.meta.stackexchange.com/
First I have already searched the help text and seen http://meta.sharepoint.stackexchange.com/questions/864/link-to-my-company-tool but the issue that there is a difference between a standard policy and a moderator's opinion and consistency across different moderators' actions. I am saying this as I have recently experienced, in my view, inconsistent reactions from the moderators.
First I have already searched the help text and seen Link to my company tool? but the issue that there is a difference between a standard policy and a moderator's opinion and consistency across different moderators' actions. I am saying this as I have recently experienced, in my view, inconsistent reactions from the moderators.
Ref: My email to Robert Lindgren
"Hi Robert----, Sorry for contacting you here on linked in, but couldn't find a way to communicate on StackExchange. This is in regards to deletion of my comments regarding my product FlyView---, I can understand your concern and they were valid but there are a few things which I believe have been overlooked, so wanted to clarify.
I had posted a couple of comments a few weeks ago, where I mentioned in the very first sentence that we owned this product "Knowing how difficult it is, navigating in SharePoint,we aimed to come-up with a solution too. Finally after months of efforts this weekend we have released FlyView"released"... those comments were also deleted.
Honestly after posting the comments today, I thought the same thing that this time I didn't mention my associate, came back after an hour and as I was editing my new comments I say the deletion notifications. Anyways it as indeed a lapse on my side.
If I had to conceal my identity then I won't using my real name, plus as per the point 1 above had mentioned in the previous posts it was our product, we all know how easy to find these associations if some-one is using his real name.
Last but not the least, we spent about two years in coming up with FlyView--, we indeed wanted to help the SharePoint users, and that's why I went to StackExchange to find people facing issues where our solution could help.
Hope it clarifies, the things, I intend to repost the comments and this time will be explicit in mentioning that I am the creator of this product. Best Regards, Hassan”Regards”
Roberts’ reply
Ref: My email to Robert Lindgren
"Hi Robert, Sorry for contacting you here on linked in, but couldn't find a way to communicate on StackExchange. This is in regards to deletion of my comments regarding my product FlyView, I can understand your concern and they were valid but there are a few things which I believe have been overlooked, so wanted to clarify.
I had posted a couple of comments a few weeks ago, where I mentioned in the very first sentence that we owned this product "Knowing how difficult it is, navigating in SharePoint,we aimed to come-up with a solution too. Finally after months of efforts this weekend we have released FlyView"... those comments were also deleted.
Honestly after posting the comments today, I thought the same thing that this time I didn't mention my associate, came back after an hour and as I was editing my new comments I say the deletion notifications. Anyways it as indeed a lapse on my side.
If I had to conceal my identity then I won't using my real name, plus as per the point 1 above had mentioned in the previous posts it was our product, we all know how easy to find these associations if some-one is using his real name.
Last but not the least, we spent about two years in coming up with FlyView, we indeed wanted to help the SharePoint users, and that's why I went to StackExchange to find people facing issues where our solution could help.
Hope it clarifies, the things, I intend to repost the comments and this time will be explicit in mentioning that I am the creator of this product. Best Regards, Hassan”
Roberts’ reply
Ref: My email
"Hi ----, Sorry for contacting you here on linked in, but couldn't find a way to communicate on StackExchange. This is in regards to deletion of my comments regarding my product ---, I can understand your concern and they were valid but there are a few things which I believe have been overlooked, so wanted to clarify.
I had posted a couple of comments a few weeks ago, where I mentioned in the very first sentence that we owned this product "Knowing how difficult it is, navigating in SharePoint,we aimed to come-up with a solution too. Finally after months of efforts this weekend we have released"... those comments were also deleted.
Honestly after posting the comments today, I thought the same thing that this time I didn't mention my associate, came back after an hour and as I was editing my new comments I say the deletion notifications. Anyways it as indeed a lapse on my side.
If I had to conceal my identity then I won't using my real name, plus as per the point 1 above had mentioned in the previous posts it was our product, we all know how easy to find these associations if some-one is using his real name.
Last but not the least, we spent about two years in coming up with --, we indeed wanted to help the SharePoint users, and that's why I went to StackExchange to find people facing issues where our solution could help.
Hope it clarifies, the things, I intend to repost the comments and this time will be explicit in mentioning that I am the creator of this product. Best Regards”
reply
Did’t post anything, received the reply next day which was in Swedish, I translated using google and it was "Thank you for your concern, but I'm not interested in just that.”
"Thank you for your concern, but I'm not interested in just that.”
of course itI didn’t get it, what he was exactly referring to by ‘that’? couldn’t reply back as he declined any further communication in linkedin (Did he think I was a recruiter, did he read my message? did Google translate it wrong..?)
Did’t post anything, received the reply next day which was in Swedish, I translated using google and it was "Thank you for your concern, but I'm not interested in just that.” of course it didn’t get it, what he was exactly referring to by ‘that’? couldn’t reply back as he declined any further communication in linkedin (Did he think I was a recruiter, did he read my message? did Google translate it wrong..?)
Did’t post anything, received the reply next day which was in Swedish, I translated using google and it was
"Thank you for your concern, but I'm not interested in just that.”
of course I didn’t get it, what he was exactly referring to by ‘that’? couldn’t reply back as he declined any further communication in linkedin (Did he think I was a recruiter, did he read my message? did Google translate it wrong..?)