Timeline for Provide 10k users more close votes
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
12 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 16, 2020 at 10:01 | history | edited | CommunityBot | Commonmark migration | |
| Apr 12, 2017 at 7:31 | history | edited | CommunityBot | replaced http://programmers.stackexchange.com/ with https://softwareengineering.stackexchange.com/ | |
| Aug 15, 2015 at 7:27 | answer | added | Jon EricsonStaffMod | timeline score: 4 | |
| Mar 20, 2014 at 21:42 | answer | added | user53019 | timeline score: 3 | |
| Mar 4, 2014 at 18:55 | answer | added | user40980 | timeline score: 4 | |
| Mar 4, 2014 at 8:26 | comment | added | gnat | I bet that "43/day" doesn't account for deleted questions, and that real number is more like 50/day, with 5-10 sure targets for closure (and subsequent deletion) | |
| Mar 4, 2014 at 7:51 | history | edited | user131 | edited tags | |
| Mar 4, 2014 at 7:51 | answer | added | user131 | timeline score: 6 | |
| Mar 3, 2014 at 21:16 | comment | added | user53019 | @GrandmasterB - there is some merit to that. Many of those who are q-banned on SO end up becoming q-banned here too. They generally fire off 3 very low quality questions which are then closed and down-voted appropriately. | |
| Mar 3, 2014 at 20:56 | comment | added | GrandmasterB | Perhaps if a user is banned from asking questions on SO, it should also apply here. | |
| Mar 3, 2014 at 18:32 | history | edited | user40980 | edited tags | |
| Mar 3, 2014 at 18:24 | history | asked | user53019 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |