They aren't perfectly fine, and trying to base the argument for why your question should be open when similar questions remain open is an exercise in personal frustration. The site is moderated by other users who do not catch every bad question that slips through the cracks, but calling attention to those questions does let people handle them.

The six guidelines for good subjective questions are what defines a good, constructive, subjective question. Your question and the questions you link fail to meet those criteria.

One additional point to mention is that questions on Stack Exchange generally require a need to be satisfied: on Programmers.SE, that need is for the question to help the asker and other visitors do their jobs better. When someone asks a question, it's presumed the answer to the question will directly improve and/or solve the problem that person is having.

Unless you happen to be one of the developers of the Zend Engine or a core PHP developer (which honestly, I highly doubt you are), there is nothing about listing all the reasons why you and others hate (or love) PHP—or what you think the language can do to be improved—that helps anyone do their jobs better or solves a real problem: it's pointless commiseration about something you don't like. If you're looking for a place to vent about whatever annoys you at the moment, this is not the site for that.

To that end, all of the questions fail point three, they start off with requesting a non-constructive and partisan tone (what do you hate about a language isn't constructive), they fail point six; they're nothing more than mindless social fun. From the answers on your question in particular, it failed the rest of the points as well. Nobody is explaining why, they're all short answers, and they're wrote opinions not backed up with facts or experiences.

If you think you can improve your question so that you can elicit answers that are useful to other people and help people do their jobs better, by all means edit your question so that people can vote to reopen it.

Edit

The following is general advice given no context about the question other than the question body itself. It turns out you, of all people, would actually be helped by the question, so assuming you edit the question to reflect why it'd help you (i.e., you explain who you are), it should (and most likely will) be reopened.

They aren't perfectly fine, and trying to base the argument for why your question should be open when similar questions remain open is an exercise in personal frustration. The site is moderated by other users who do not catch every bad question that slips through the cracks, but calling attention to those questions does let people handle them.

The six guidelines for good subjective questions are what defines a good, constructive, subjective question. Your question and the questions you link fail to meet those criteria.

One additional point to mention is that questions on Stack Exchange generally require a need to be satisfied: on Programmers.SE, that need is for the question to help the asker and other visitors do their jobs better. When someone asks a question, it's presumed the answer to the question will directly improve and/or solve the problem that person is having.

Unless you happen to be one of the developers of the Zend Engine or a core PHP developer (which honestly, I highly doubt you are), there is nothing about listing all the reasons why you and others hate (or love) PHP—or what you think the language can do to be improved—that helps anyone do their jobs better or solves a real problem: it's pointless commiseration about something you don't like. If you're looking for a place to vent about whatever annoys you at the moment, this is not the site for that.

To that end, all of the questions fail point three, they start off with requesting a non-constructive and partisan tone (what do you hate about a language isn't constructive), they fail point six; they're nothing more than mindless social fun. From the answers on your question in particular, it failed the rest of the points as well. Nobody is explaining why, they're all short answers, and they're wrote opinions not backed up with facts or experiences.

If you think you can improve your question so that you can elicit answers that are useful to other people and help people do their jobs better, by all means edit your question so that people can vote to reopen it.

They aren't perfectly fine, and trying to base the argument for why your question should be open when similar questions remain open is an exercise in personal frustration. The site is moderated by other users who do not catch every bad question that slips through the cracks, but calling attention to those questions does let people handle them.

The six guidelines for good subjective questions are what defines a good, constructive, subjective question. Your question and the questions you link fail to meet those criteria.

One additional point to mention is that questions on Stack Exchange generally require a need to be satisfied: on Programmers.SE, that need is for the question to help the asker and other visitors do their jobs better. When someone asks a question, it's presumed the answer to the question will directly improve and/or solve the problem that person is having.

There is nothing about listing all the reasons why you and others hate (or love) PHP, or any other language, that helps anyone do their jobs better or solves a problem: it's pointless commiseration about something you don't like. If you're looking for a place to vent about whatever annoys you at the moment, this is not the site for that.

To that end, all of the questions fail point three, they start off with requesting a non-constructive and partisan tone (what do you hate about a language isn't constructive), they fail point six; they're nothing more than mindless social fun. From the answers on your question in particular, it failed the rest of the points as well. Nobody is explaining why, they're all short answers, and they're wrote opinions not backed up with facts or experiences.

If you think you can improve your question so that you can elicit answers that are useful to other people and help people do their jobs better, by all means edit your question so that people can vote to reopen it.

They aren't perfectly fine, and trying to base the argument for why your question should be open when similar questions remain open is an exercise in personal frustration. The site is moderated by other users who do not catch every bad question that slips through the cracks, but calling attention to those questions does let people handle them.

The six guidelines for good subjective questions are what defines a good, constructive, subjective question. Your question and the questions you link fail to meet those criteria.

One additional point to mention is that questions on Stack Exchange generally require a need to be satisfied: on Programmers.SE, that need is for the question to help the asker and other visitors do their jobs better. When someone asks a question, it's presumed the answer to the question will directly improve and/or solve the problem that person is having.

Unless you happen to be one of the developers of the Zend Engine or a core PHP developer (which honestly, I highly doubt you are), there is nothing about listing all the reasons why you and others hate (or love) PHP—or what you think the language can do to be improved—that helps anyone do their jobs better or solves a real problem: it's pointless commiseration about something you don't like. If you're looking for a place to vent about whatever annoys you at the moment, this is not the site for that.

To that end, all of the questions fail point three, they start off with requesting a non-constructive and partisan tone (what do you hate about a language isn't constructive), they fail point six; they're nothing more than mindless social fun. From the answers on your question in particular, it failed the rest of the points as well. Nobody is explaining why, they're all short answers, and they're wrote opinions not backed up with facts or experiences.

If you think you can improve your question so that you can elicit answers that are useful to other people and help people do their jobs better, by all means edit your question so that people can vote to reopen it.