Timeline for New Site Name and Scope Proposals
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
12 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 16, 2020 at 10:01 | history | edited | CommunityBot | Commonmark migration | |
| May 25, 2016 at 9:41 | comment | added | Bart van Ingen Schenau | Where Agile/Scrum/PM questions should go depends on the perspective that the asker wants. If it is the perspective of a regular team member, then here would be the right site. If it is more the manager/scrum master/product owner perspective, then PM.se would be a better site. | |
| May 24, 2016 at 22:42 | comment | added | 5gon12eder | Would you be open to changing “for professionals and students” to something that makes clear that non-professional enthusiasts are welcome, too? | |
| May 24, 2016 at 19:40 | history | edited | maple_shaftMod | CC BY-SA 3.0 | added 63 characters in body |
| May 24, 2016 at 18:24 | comment | added | maple_shaft Mod | As I said before, the only thing I said I was "open" to for removal was software licensing. | |
| May 24, 2016 at 18:20 | comment | added | maple_shaft Mod | @ThomasOwens I think this isn't a slippery slope. It is well established that if I have a question needing help on an algorithm from a very very large community of programmers and software developers then I would ask on SO. If I want a smaller community of software engineers I ask here. If I have a theory question that has no substantial practical real world problem statement, it should be on CS. If it is a question about CS principles to be applied to a clearly articulated applied real world problem then I should ask here. | |
| May 24, 2016 at 18:14 | history | edited | maple_shaftMod | CC BY-SA 3.0 | deleted 49 characters in body |
| May 24, 2016 at 18:14 | comment | added | maple_shaft Mod | @Snowman I concede that point. It is a slippery slope. | |
| May 24, 2016 at 18:12 | comment | added | Thomas Owens Mod | I have similar questions. If you start stripping away things that are currently on-topic, but may have a better home on a different site (quality assurance and testing to Stack Overflow and SQA depending, methodologies and processes to Project Management, licensing to Law and Open Source, algorithms and data structures to SO for implementation and Computer Science for theory), you end up with requirements, architecture and design, and configuration management. Now that the network has grown, I can argue that there are better homes for just about everything in our on-topic list. | |
| May 24, 2016 at 18:08 | comment | added | user22815 | Wouldn't "Engineering Accreditation and Certification" fall into "career and education advice" which is off-topic? Or would you support making only those specific subtopics on-topic? | |
| May 24, 2016 at 18:04 | history | edited | maple_shaftMod | CC BY-SA 3.0 | added 49 characters in body |
| May 24, 2016 at 17:59 | history | answered | maple_shaftMod | CC BY-SA 3.0 |