Skip to main content

Timeline for Standards in Enterprise Development

Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0

13 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Oct 24, 2011 at 8:45 vote accept Paul T Davies
Oct 17, 2011 at 1:31 answer added programmx10 timeline score: 0
Oct 17, 2011 at 0:51 answer added Caleb timeline score: 0
Oct 17, 2011 at 0:28 answer added JeffO timeline score: 0
Oct 16, 2011 at 22:50 comment added Lionel @Job Maybe it's time to post the question on english.stackexchange.com and attach link?
Oct 16, 2011 at 16:44 comment added Peter Rowell @Job: Actually "we" also can be kind of slippery. There is the Imperial We, meaning me (e.g. The Queen said, "We are not amused."); there is the Social We, meaning us (e.g. "We are going to the park."); and there is the Managerial We, meaning you (e.g. "Why don't we recode that application?").
Oct 16, 2011 at 15:57 comment added Blrfl If the process of development could be simplified to such a degree that what you propose were practical, it would have been automated long ago and this industry would be much, much smaller than it is.
Oct 16, 2011 at 13:32 comment added Job Whenever someone uses the words "we" and "should" in the same sentence, I must ask them to define the meaning of both. "Should" is the harder of the two to define, and it gets deeply philosophical.
Oct 16, 2011 at 11:38 answer added Lionel timeline score: 9
Oct 16, 2011 at 11:24 answer added johannes timeline score: 0
Oct 16, 2011 at 11:24 comment added WojonsTech +1 to @Pierre303 another issue with enterprise development it is really boring as he says but they dont want other people to read there code easily so they wont really wanna use stadnereds
Oct 16, 2011 at 11:06 comment added user2567 Enterprise software development is already boring enough.
Oct 16, 2011 at 11:02 history asked Paul T Davies CC BY-SA 3.0