Skip to main content
Software Engineering

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

Required fields*

4
  • Yea, my license is compatible with sfYaml's license assuming sfYaml is under the MIT license as would suggest based on the LICENSE file in the source code under version control (github.com/fabpot/yaml/blob/master/LICENSE). Thanks. Commented Nov 29, 2011 at 12:39
  • Yeap, MIT is also listed as the library's licence on the webpage... They must have meant for the CC licence to be for the webpage itself, but they have it as an appendix to the lib's documentation. But since MIT is in the repo, it's MIT. I'm updating the answer... Commented Nov 29, 2011 at 12:43
  • I am probably going to be going with MIT myself, maybe BSD, bit I believe both are compatible with each other. Commented Nov 29, 2011 at 13:03
  • If it doesn't make any difference to you, go with MIT, there's some debate on whether BSD and MIT are compatible Commented Nov 29, 2011 at 13:04