Timeline for Why didn't the C++ Standard adopt expression templates?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 6, 2014 at 22:20 | history | edited | sbi | CC BY-SA 3.0 | edited body |
| Jan 25, 2012 at 20:24 | history | edited | sbi | CC BY-SA 3.0 | added 625 characters in body |
| Jan 25, 2012 at 20:22 | vote | accept | DeadMG | ||
| Jan 25, 2012 at 20:16 | history | migrated | from stackoverflow.com (revisions) | ||
| Jan 25, 2012 at 20:13 | comment | added | R. Martinho Fernandes | @sbi ah, that makes sense. | |
| Jan 25, 2012 at 20:10 | comment | added | Xeo | I think I just have to link this: Is std::string part of the STL? | |
| Jan 25, 2012 at 20:08 | comment | added | sbi | @R.MartinhoFernandes: That doesn't mean, however, the committee had any resources to spare. (And std::string was changed to turn it into an STL container, BTW.) | |
| Jan 25, 2012 at 20:06 | comment | added | R. Martinho Fernandes | But std::string and iostreams were not in the STL. | |
| Jan 25, 2012 at 20:04 | history | answered | sbi | CC BY-SA 3.0 |