Edit - Software Engineering Stack Exchange

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

Required fields*

Rev

The hard balance between "the freedom of our lib users" and "less trouble to us". I am starting to believe that encapsulation is better in a sense that I will prevent bugs on my own coding, and I will help end users to prevent bugs too. But the lack of freedom may simply put them away also, looking for alternatives... May be coding not yet used but foreseen functionalities thru public methods can help on balancing that, but demands more time.

Aquarius Power
– Aquarius Power

2016-06-17 02:11:28 +00:00
Commented Jun 17, 2016 at 2:11
Too bad the refactored version isn't on github....

jmoreno
– jmoreno

2018-01-19 11:42:03 +00:00
Commented Jan 19, 2018 at 11:42
Example that can be used against encapsulation. Encapsulation indeed is not needed to create a quality game.

Basilevs
– Basilevs

2024-04-16 06:06:49 +00:00
Commented Apr 16, 2024 at 6:06

Add a comment |

Correct minor typos or mistakes
Clarify meaning without changing it
Add related resources or links
Always respect the author’s intent
Don’t use edits to reply to the author

create code fences with backticks ` or tildes ~
```
like so
```
add language identifier to highlight code
```python
def function(foo):
print(foo)
```
put returns between paragraphs
for linebreak add 2 spaces at end
_italic_ or **bold**
indent code by 4 spaces
backtick escapes `like _so_`
quote by placing > at start of line
to make links (use https whenever possible)

<https://example.com>

[example](https://example.com)

<a href="https://example.com">example</a>

formatting help »
answering help »