Timeline for Should I use a code repository if I am the only one working on a project? [duplicate]
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
28 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 20, 2017 at 11:04 | history | edited | amon | edited tags | |
| Apr 12, 2017 at 7:31 | history | edited | CommunityBot | replaced http://programmers.stackexchange.com/ with https://softwareengineering.stackexchange.com/ | |
| May 22, 2015 at 0:57 | comment | added | Michael Durrant | And also git remote add {github address}; git push; now you have a backup. | |
| May 22, 2015 at 0:56 | comment | added | Michael Durrant | cd where_the_code_is; git init; git add .; git commit-m"Initial Commit" Now you have source control. That's a low barrier! | |
| Apr 23, 2012 at 14:37 | comment | added | Eelvex | I find the idea of not using a repository+backup for anything that you create, absurd. | |
| Apr 23, 2012 at 8:06 | history | edited | CommunityBot | insert duplicate link | |
| Apr 23, 2012 at 8:06 | history | closed | mattnz ChrisF | exact duplicate | |
| Apr 23, 2012 at 8:05 | answer | added | Matt Wilko | timeline score: 0 | |
| Apr 23, 2012 at 7:31 | comment | added | Secure | @iammilind: Well, if you don't know about the usefulness of backups yet, then you will learn it the hard and painful way. Imagine if some failure corrupts your repository. | |
| Apr 23, 2012 at 7:25 | answer | added | user1249 | timeline score: 1 | |
| Apr 23, 2012 at 6:23 | answer | added | Rocklan | timeline score: 4 | |
| Apr 23, 2012 at 5:09 | history | edited | gnat | edited tags | |
| Apr 23, 2012 at 5:09 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/#!/StackProgrammer/status/194291984066818048 | ||
| Apr 23, 2012 at 5:02 | comment | added | iammilind | Imagine if you lose/damage the computer which contained your latest work. | |
| Apr 23, 2012 at 5:00 | answer | added | Peter Smith | timeline score: 1 | |
| Apr 23, 2012 at 4:29 | history | edited | gnat | CC BY-SA 3.0 | personal stuff removed |
| Apr 23, 2012 at 2:47 | history | migrated | from stackoverflow.com (revisions) | ||
| Apr 23, 2012 at 2:20 | answer | added | ghoti | timeline score: 0 | |
| Apr 22, 2012 at 22:58 | answer | added | Necronet | timeline score: 7 | |
| Apr 22, 2012 at 22:50 | answer | added | user997112 | timeline score: 1 | |
| Apr 22, 2012 at 22:50 | answer | added | octopusgrabbus | timeline score: 2 | |
| Apr 22, 2012 at 22:48 | comment | added | David Harkness | Once you call it a "project" it's worth using revision control. | |
| Apr 22, 2012 at 22:46 | comment | added | Tibor | Does it? I mean, if it is 100 lines or so, probably not. But when you cross a 1000 lines barrier, it might be useful. Besides, it is more a question of scope and intention than current size. | |
| Apr 22, 2012 at 22:43 | answer | added | Christian Schlichtherle | timeline score: 19 | |
| Apr 22, 2012 at 22:42 | answer | added | siegi | timeline score: 1 | |
| Apr 22, 2012 at 22:36 | comment | added | Louis Wasserman | Depends how big the project is. | |
| Apr 22, 2012 at 22:36 | answer | added | Tim Pote | timeline score: 35 | |
| Apr 22, 2012 at 22:34 | history | asked | Cin316 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |