Timeline for Tips on persuading boss that code review is a good thing
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
11 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 8, 2020 at 11:52 | comment | added | Flater | Note that anti-review manager often resort to "but I decide the budget and I don't want to spend the budget required for reviews/testing/other good practices". Your answer, while very good, doesn't quite counter that budgetary concern. | |
| Jun 1, 2014 at 11:32 | history | edited | gnat | CC BY-SA 3.0 | typo corrected |
| Nov 5, 2010 at 20:23 | vote | accept | Kevin D | ||
| Oct 31, 2010 at 19:06 | comment | added | Scott Whitlock | From slide 21 of Greg Wilson's presentation called "Bits of Evidence", he claims "Rigorous inspections can remove 60-90% of errors before the first test is run. (Fagan 1975)" He has great citations. :) | |
| Oct 31, 2010 at 18:33 | comment | added | user2567 | Do you have a link to the study to share, so I can use it in the future? | |
| Oct 31, 2010 at 17:15 | comment | added | Spudd86 | You can mention it catches an average of 65% of defects, and not only that but it catches lots of the ones that unit tests generally don't. | |
| Oct 31, 2010 at 13:18 | history | edited | user2567 | CC BY-SA 2.5 | added 175 characters in body |
| Oct 31, 2010 at 13:06 | history | edited | user2567 | CC BY-SA 2.5 | added 118 characters in body; added 18 characters in body |
| Oct 31, 2010 at 10:31 | history | edited | user2567 | CC BY-SA 2.5 | added 29 characters in body |
| Oct 31, 2010 at 10:07 | history | edited | user2567 | CC BY-SA 2.5 | added 256 characters in body |
| Oct 31, 2010 at 9:42 | history | answered | user2567 | CC BY-SA 2.5 |