Timeline for Do stored procedures violate three-tier separation?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
11 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 26, 2016 at 6:16 | comment | added | Sorter | "do things that resemble object-oriented programming in non-object-oriented languages" This statement is enough to explain. | |
| Oct 24, 2012 at 1:57 | vote | accept | Tulains Córdova | ||
| Oct 22, 2012 at 14:46 | comment | added | jmoreno | @user1598390: that's fine, just remember that the goal is logical seperation of concerns, not putting things on different hardware. | |
| Oct 22, 2012 at 14:10 | comment | added | Blrfl | @user1598390: What you're looking at is a bunch of "things" that touch each other in well-defined ways. The nomenclature isn't all that important. | |
| Oct 22, 2012 at 12:41 | comment | added | Tulains Córdova | @jmoreno This question helped me ( stackoverflow.com/questions/120438/… ). The problem is that spanish (my mother tongue) language technical literature uses a single word for it ("capa"), whereas english has two very distinct words. | |
| Oct 22, 2012 at 12:40 | comment | added | Tulains Córdova | @blrfl That's something I've taken care of ;) | |
| Oct 22, 2012 at 10:48 | comment | added | Blrfl | @user1598390: You can say that as long as you can prove it. The first time the presentation layer SELECTs directly from tables (the data tier), the model has been broken. | |
| Oct 22, 2012 at 10:43 | history | edited | Blrfl | CC BY-SA 3.0 | Made use of layers/tiers consistent. |
| Oct 22, 2012 at 3:33 | comment | added | jmoreno | @user1598390: yes. Although it would be layer to say 3-layer, and not 3 tier. | |
| Oct 22, 2012 at 3:06 | comment | added | Tulains Córdova | So I can them them that stored procedures are part of the logic tier, architecture-wise, regardless the fact that they are stored in the database ? | |
| Oct 22, 2012 at 2:36 | history | answered | Blrfl | CC BY-SA 3.0 |