Skip to main content

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

Required fields*

2
  • The big problem I have with XML is it is very verbose. If I have 2000 strings that are 20 characters in size, that's 40000 bytes, or 40K. Now add XML and the overhead of XML tags across everything can really add up. <MyString> and </MyString> adds up to 21 more characters per string. This is the problem I have with XML in this particular scenario where size matters, but isn't so important where binary or something would be required Commented Nov 12, 2012 at 2:23
  • 1
    @Earlz: as I wrote above, if size really matters, why not try data compression (for example, with icsharpcode.net/OpenSource/SharpZipLib/Default.aspx)? And honestly, are you absolutely sure it matters in your scenario if the files have 40K or 80K? Commented Nov 12, 2012 at 10:38