Timeline for Is LINQ to SQL dead?
Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5
12 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 16, 2020 at 10:01 | history | edited | CommunityBot | Commonmark migration | |
| Nov 15, 2010 at 16:44 | comment | added | Robert Harvey | Not again. This question has been debated ad-nauseum on StackOverflow. Can you say FUD? | |
| Nov 15, 2010 at 16:06 | answer | added | Bill | timeline score: 2 | |
| Nov 13, 2010 at 0:25 | comment | added | MetalMikester | MS has a little .NET 4 slideshow type of thing that said it's not dead - but that can mean many things. They did improve it in .NET 4.0: damieng.com/blog/2009/06/01/linq-to-sql-changes-in-net-40 | |
| Nov 12, 2010 at 19:06 | vote | accept | Amir Rezaei | ||
| Nov 12, 2010 at 14:10 | answer | added | Jetti | timeline score: 1 | |
| Nov 12, 2010 at 10:33 | answer | added | richeym | timeline score: 12 | |
| Nov 12, 2010 at 9:20 | comment | added | fearoffours | +1 great Q. This is fascinating to me, I've been condsidering moving my stored procedures and paramterised SQL query strings to LINQ to SQL for improved readability, I had no idea it wasn't being developed anymore. | |
| Nov 12, 2010 at 9:15 | history | edited | Amir Rezaei | CC BY-SA 2.5 | added 382 characters in body |
| Nov 12, 2010 at 8:57 | answer | added | FinnNk | timeline score: 11 | |
| Nov 12, 2010 at 8:56 | answer | added | ChrisF | timeline score: 2 | |
| Nov 12, 2010 at 8:35 | history | asked | Amir Rezaei | CC BY-SA 2.5 |