Timeline for Is there a viable alternative to the agile development methodology?
Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5
2 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 4, 2017 at 11:02 | comment | added | Mikko Rantalainen | Waterfall works if you can afford it. Somebody above claimed that the NASA moon project software cost was roughly $1000 per line of code. Most shops need something like $1–10 per line of code and agile is better for that kind of situations. However, I do not pretend that agile provides better quality overall. It basically boils down to can you afford to page lots of money to be pretty sure the software is correct or is it cheaper to figure out the solution once you find out that the software is not correct. | |
| Nov 12, 2010 at 16:42 | history | answered | Martijn Verburg | CC BY-SA 2.5 |