Timeline for Is LINQ to SQL dead?
Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5
5 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 1, 2011 at 21:56 | comment | added | alternative | @Jeremy Do people still use TeX? | |
| Nov 18, 2010 at 19:54 | comment | added | Bill | From a large enterprise point of view the fact that the core is no longer being modified means it can finally go on the list of approved techniques in many cases. In my line of work we have been waiting for this for some time. EF is still to volatile to jump into yet and L2S is always going to attract interest in situations where the overhead of EF is not wanted. | |
| Nov 15, 2010 at 20:25 | comment | added | Jeremy | Sorry but "nothing new but compatability and bug fix" means its in containment. That is basically a guarantee that the community will move away from it, you won't see lots of new projects using it and so you probably don't want to use it in new projects either. "Dead" doesn't mean it doesn't work, it just means there is little innovation or interest. | |
| Nov 15, 2010 at 19:33 | comment | added | quentin-starin | +1 for "stable" Best way to view L2S, imho. Stable and no longer being extended/changed. | |
| Nov 15, 2010 at 16:06 | history | answered | Bill | CC BY-SA 2.5 |