Skip to main content

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

2
  • There's an edit.. Commented Mar 20, 2013 at 13:32
  • Thanks. "randomly moving" is not enough of a clarification. How is it random? I outlined an optimization you can do with "randomly moving" points, if there's an upper bound on the motion. To repeat, if there's no upper bound then there's nothing better than a linear search. At that point it's just a matter of optimizing your Python code, which you haven't shown. Commented Mar 20, 2013 at 13:55