Stack Exchange network consists of 183 Q&A communities including Stack Overflow, the largest, most trusted online community for developers to learn, share their knowledge, and build their careers.
Visit Stack Exchange
Stack Internal
Knowledge at work
Bring the best of human thought and AI automation together at your work.
Explore Stack InternalYou probably already tried this option, but you don't specifically state so in your question:
Can you instantiate the objects and set them to a certain state? Perhaps calling doSomething results in a some new state that is enough to verify it was has properly operated on the objects?
Of course if one of the objects launches a nuclear missile touches a lot of external state it may be a no-no.
You probably already tried this option, but you don't specifically state so in your question:
Can you instantiate the objects and set them to a certain state? Perhaps calling doSomething results in a some new state that is enough to verify it was has properly operated on the objects?
Of course if one of the objects launches a nuclear missile touches a lot of external state it may be a no-no.
You probably already tried this option, but you don't specifically state so in your question:
Can you instantiate the objects and set them to a certain state? Perhaps calling doSomething results in a some new state that is enough to verify it has properly operated on the objects?
Of course if one of the objects launches a nuclear missile touches a lot of external state it may be a no-no.
You probably already tried this option, but you don't specifically state so in your question:
Can you instantiate the objects and set them to a certain state? Perhaps calling doSomething results in a some new state that is enough to verify it was has properly operated on the objects?
Of course if one of the objects launches a nuclear missile touches a lot of external state it may be a no-no.
