Timeline for How much should I be using 'let' vs 'const' in ES6?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 1, 2018 at 21:43 | comment | added | jtr13 | @MathiasBynens I get it but why call it that? It is creating a huge amount of confusion as this page demonstrates. | |
| Feb 28, 2017 at 3:04 | comment | added | MrN00b | @MathiasBynens I think the (only?) problem with const is that it's called const. It's a dumb name (in javascript) that confuses many (all?) developers at first. IMO better would be if const had've been called let (especially because let is shorter but const is vastly more common) and let called something else. | |
| Sep 25, 2016 at 14:55 | comment | added | Mathias Bynens | @nueverest Because that’s not what const is for. Did you read the above? | |
| Sep 23, 2016 at 18:48 | comment | added | nu everest | Why would you name something const if it is not constant? | |
| Feb 5, 2016 at 9:16 | review | First posts | |||
| Mar 6, 2016 at 9:16 | |||||
| Feb 5, 2016 at 9:13 | history | answered | Mathias Bynens | CC BY-SA 3.0 |