Timeline for Why does everyone use Git in a centralized manner?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
10 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 20, 2016 at 22:11 | audit | First posts | |||
| Apr 20, 2016 at 22:11 | |||||
| Apr 13, 2016 at 2:28 | comment | added | Charles Duffy | "necessarily must have a complete history [...] locally in order to do anything" -- not true; modern DSCMs support partial repos ("shallow checkouts" in bzr terms, "shallow clones" in git terms). | |
| Apr 11, 2016 at 18:06 | comment | added | user7433 | Emailing patches is fairly painless, just in case anyone is considering it, just use git format-patch and then git send-email. Did that when I didn't want to fiddle around with Github's access controls and it was very straightforward, everyone has email after all. | |
| Apr 11, 2016 at 4:23 | comment | added | curiousdannii | They're technically equivalent, not socially equivalent. | |
| Apr 10, 2016 at 0:49 | history | edited | Steve Jessop | CC BY-SA 3.0 | added 7 characters in body |
| Apr 10, 2016 at 0:33 | history | edited | Steve Jessop | CC BY-SA 3.0 | added 403 characters in body |
| Apr 10, 2016 at 0:25 | history | edited | Steve Jessop | CC BY-SA 3.0 | added 74 characters in body |
| Apr 10, 2016 at 0:15 | history | edited | Steve Jessop | CC BY-SA 3.0 | added 132 characters in body |
| Apr 10, 2016 at 0:03 | history | edited | Steve Jessop | CC BY-SA 3.0 | added 132 characters in body |
| Apr 9, 2016 at 23:57 | history | answered | Steve Jessop | CC BY-SA 3.0 |