Skip to main content
11 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Apr 17, 2019 at 14:48 vote accept Christopher Francisco
Feb 21, 2017 at 8:08 answer added Sergio Basurco timeline score: 4
Dec 28, 2016 at 21:23 comment added Christopher Francisco @RomanSusi mostly because it's well documented, community is broad so it doesn't feel like "my own [unrefined] approach" and it if it were not by the problem described in my question, I'd be perfect to be honest; At least for property software development (since we need a well structured methodology, rather than just throwing random PRs from time to time)
Dec 28, 2016 at 19:37 comment added Roman Susi Just 2c: No matter how many devs use it, answer "why?" first for yourself...
Nov 9, 2016 at 23:49 comment added axl There are several discussions about how to solve various issues with GitFlow on GitHub and other places. Sometimes there just isn't a silver bullet.
Nov 9, 2016 at 2:47 comment added Christopher Francisco @axl I understand what you mean, but I'm trying to follow gitflow as close as possible to it's documentation. I'd rather not doing any kind of "hackz" because since gitflow is already adopted by many many developers, they should already have a solution for this simple thing
Nov 5, 2016 at 14:30 comment added axl The merge to master will be a "copy", no need to merge it to develop. Make hot fixes from the previous release branch, not master, and merge to both from there, and you won't have the problem. Master is not adding much to the model so you can actually drop it completely, IMO.
Nov 4, 2016 at 9:28 comment added F.P Want a clean history? Don't use gitflow. It by definition pollutes your history. Instead, think about what you really need and build a workflow around that, so it actually fits how you want to work.
Nov 3, 2016 at 23:46 history tweeted twitter.com/StackSoftEng/status/794324783177617415
Nov 3, 2016 at 21:45 comment added Jace Browning Please define "clean history".
Nov 3, 2016 at 19:21 history asked Christopher Francisco CC BY-SA 3.0