Skip to main content

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

Required fields*

8
  • The problem is that the team can use both A and B, and did not indicate a preference for either when I asked them for input. Commented Jan 10, 2017 at 13:12
  • @EpicSam what about their past projects then ? Commented Jan 10, 2017 at 13:17
  • 1
    Both A and B have been used. However they want to move to using 1 technology for all projects. Both technologies's performance is good enough for current projects. However the potential higher performance of one of them should be considered when looking to potential future projects. Commented Jan 10, 2017 at 13:29
  • 3
    @EpicSam better look for the community around the language and the library/Framework available to help you in your projects. Commented Jan 10, 2017 at 13:43
  • 6
    I agree with @Walfrat . I would bet the language with "highest potential" is straight-up assembly or some raw CPU instruction set. But we aren't talking about those languages because its "obvious" that having tools like compilers, interpreters, and pre-written libraries is ultra important. I think the availability of tools / community knowledge is more important than the choice between interpreted/compiled Commented Jan 10, 2017 at 13:57