Timeline for C++ namespace name isolation
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
14 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 12, 2019 at 7:38 | history | protected | gnat | ||
| Apr 12, 2019 at 2:11 | answer | added | Anthony | timeline score: 1 | |
| Apr 21, 2017 at 10:09 | answer | added | D Drmmr | timeline score: 1 | |
| Apr 20, 2017 at 16:59 | comment | added | user270061 | >>What is side-effect-prone supposed to mean?>> this have been answered by me across the comments. I will update the post or make a self-answer with the summary soon. | |
| Apr 20, 2017 at 16:19 | comment | added | JAB | "using for namespaces/names is side-effect-prone" What is side-effect-prone supposed to mean? using just allows you to refer to things without the qualified name, it's perfectly usable in individual translation units, and you can minimize issues by using specific functions/classes/etc. rather than the whole namespace (using namespace does basically defeat the purpose of namespaces, if that's what you meant). In fact, if you want to do proper ADL with std::swap you need using std::swap inside your swap implementations. | |
| Apr 20, 2017 at 12:43 | answer | added | Useless | timeline score: 4 | |
| Apr 20, 2017 at 9:30 | answer | added | besc | timeline score: 10 | |
| Apr 19, 2017 at 22:09 | comment | added | user270061 | They kicked me in here :) | |
| Apr 19, 2017 at 21:18 | answer | added | Sjoerd | timeline score: 6 | |
| Apr 19, 2017 at 20:47 | comment | added | Sjoerd | So you are "relatively new to C++" and come up with an approach that you "couldn't find implemented yet." Sounds like this should be on codereview. | |
| Apr 19, 2017 at 19:58 | review | Close votes | |||
| Apr 25, 2017 at 3:03 | |||||
| Apr 19, 2017 at 16:41 | answer | added | BЈовић | timeline score: 8 | |
| Apr 19, 2017 at 16:13 | review | First posts | |||
| Apr 22, 2017 at 6:44 | |||||
| Apr 19, 2017 at 16:11 | history | asked | user270061 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |