Timeline for How much is too much Dependency Injection?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
5 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 31, 2019 at 9:09 | comment | added | El Mac | @ThomasCarlisle wasn't the point of XML configuration that you don't have to touch the code (even compile) to change it? I have never (or barely) used it because of the two things Mark mentioned, but you do gain something in return. | |
| Sep 22, 2017 at 15:13 | audit | First posts | |||
| Sep 22, 2017 at 15:13 | |||||
| Sep 7, 2017 at 13:17 | comment | added | Thomas Carlisle | I really like this answer, and especially this statement used in the context of Spring: "Configuring dependencies using XML is the worst of both worlds. First, you lose compile-time type safety, but you don't gain anything. An XML configuration file can easily be as big as the code it tries to replace." | |
| Sep 5, 2017 at 19:22 | vote | accept | Antimon | ||
| Sep 5, 2017 at 7:17 | history | answered | Mark Seemann | CC BY-SA 3.0 |