Skip to main content

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

2
  • * a client can hold connection open no matter if we require a response or just 202 * client goes down is similar for 202 * the use case demand immediate response anyway, shouldn't have human involved * this one is a good point, server won't have a chance to validate response and notify client on any error I see your point, i'm thinking since the current case is simple enough, no need polling, not much validation, and don't expect delay response etc. thinking to just go with sync path and as situation comes up we go to async? can avoid premature optimization this way i think Commented Aug 4, 2020 at 18:37
  • 1
    Just laying out the situation, its up to you to decide what goes. Commented Aug 4, 2020 at 23:37