Timeline for How to deal with different level of abstractions (blurred line between data and models)
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
3 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 3, 2021 at 9:58 | comment | added | Laiv | and each different form's model you don't deal with them because they don't exist. There's only one possible model, the meta-data model. Think in XML and XSD. Your meta-model is the XSD defining the elements available and their properties, constraints, features, etc. Then you have an undefined number of XML applying these rules. If were to map these XML to classes, you will still have only one model, no countless models (classes) for each XML possible. | |
| Jan 25, 2021 at 11:18 | comment | added | ibi0tux | This is what my question is all about : how to deal both with meta-models that represent generic form concept and each different form's model which would each represent the structure of of the data that would be entered in these forms. And as you mention it we can also add additionnal abstraction layers with models that would add meta data, which means we need to combine form model with additionnal fields. | |
| Jan 22, 2021 at 23:16 | history | answered | Doc Brown | CC BY-SA 4.0 |