Timeline for How to solve reacting to events from different sources which have a common source
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
11 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 13, 2022 at 7:37 | vote | accept | Jeroen van Langen | ||
| Jan 12, 2022 at 11:15 | answer | added | pjc50 | timeline score: 4 | |
| Jan 12, 2022 at 10:58 | history | edited | Jeroen van Langen | CC BY-SA 4.0 | added 118 characters in body |
| Jan 12, 2022 at 10:47 | history | edited | Jeroen van Langen | CC BY-SA 4.0 | added 831 characters in body |
| Jan 12, 2022 at 10:42 | comment | added | Jeroen van Langen | @pjc50 I've added some extra information to the question (it was too long to post as comment) | |
| Jan 12, 2022 at 10:42 | history | edited | Jeroen van Langen | CC BY-SA 4.0 | added 831 characters in body |
| Jan 12, 2022 at 10:29 | comment | added | pjc50 | So .. what actually are the events? Do both B and C send the same type of event? Do they both theoretically require some kind of response? Is it possible for them to fire for other reasons? Could you simply take one of the BD or CD links out? | |
| Jan 12, 2022 at 10:18 | comment | added | Jeroen van Langen | @Darem Also thought about that, passing a token or something as argument or using a ThreadLocal. But the problem remains, "Was it the last event, or need other modules to be updated. so it needs to be recalculated." | |
| Jan 12, 2022 at 10:12 | comment | added | Darem | A option would be to use a key or something and simple discard duplicates | |
| S Jan 12, 2022 at 9:59 | review | First questions | |||
| Jan 12, 2022 at 12:17 | |||||
| S Jan 12, 2022 at 9:59 | history | asked | Jeroen van Langen | CC BY-SA 4.0 |