Skip to main content

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

Required fields*

11
  • 6
    "Does the company's website work without JavaScript" -- that's ridiculous question to ask in 2011, when AJAX is the way do develop web applications. "is it only IE-compatible" - that's also ridiculous to ask, when IE has only 30% of the market, and Firefox is the leading browser. Commented Apr 26, 2011 at 16:27
  • 7
    @vartec You'd be surprised. Commented Apr 26, 2011 at 17:45
  • 8
    @vartec: building something that only works properly in IE would indeed be ridiculous in 2011. But then, so would developing without source control, and I don't see anyone saying that it's silly to have that on the Joel Test still. Companies do ridiculous things, sometimes. Commented Apr 26, 2011 at 20:50
  • 4
    I don't know if the company's website is representative of the work they do for clients. In most of the places I have worked at, the company website was neglected for long periods of time. It was the lowest priority project. Commented Jun 4, 2012 at 15:13
  • 3
    Anyway, whole thing is not really related to the topic. Joel's test is a measure of quality of development process, not measure of the quality of the product. Commented Jun 4, 2012 at 20:46