Skip to main content

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

Required fields*

7
  • 1
    We need a few more details to give good answers here. What OS must be supported by that editor? What comments are you talking about: inline the code, or in a separate text file? In the latter case, what formats are preferred? If inline: what programming languages are targeted? Commented Mar 11, 2015 at 11:49
  • These info have been added. Commented Mar 11, 2015 at 12:11
  • Much as I like the sound of this, it's a huge step backwards from an IDE to an editor. Are you truly willing to forgo a debugger just for that? I would advise you to stick with a good IDE and add in-line comments with the path to the image. Commented Mar 11, 2015 at 12:18
  • No, you don't have to sacrifice any of IDE or editor functionalities, it's just a richer rendering. Commented Mar 11, 2015 at 12:20
  • 1
    Thanks, clearer now. But if the programming language doesn't matter, we could recommend you one suited for Visual Basic only, and it would fit your requirements. I doubt you'd be happy with that ;) Do you rather mean it should support as many as possible? As none has full support for all of them, which ones are a must to be covered? What about auto-completion, syntax highlighting, code folding, and all those other features one might wish for or expect in a "programmers editor"? Commented Mar 11, 2015 at 12:21