Timeline for Apollo Guidance Computer (AGC) Compiler?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
10 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 4, 2022 at 14:42 | comment | added | J... | @tckosvic Ok, that makes more sense. The question is asking specifically about the AGC so this answer seems to read as though you're implying that you yourself were working on the AGC and that you saw FORTRAN code compiled for it, which makes it a bit misleading given that every other source available suggests the programs written for the AGC itself were written strictly in assembly. This doesn't really answer the question, then, and is more of an interesting sidenote. | |
| Feb 4, 2022 at 14:32 | comment | added | tckosvic | As said, I can only respond re: the question about the high level language in use at the time. All code I saw and was involved with was fortran. I only had involvement with scientific calcs, I had no experience with the AGC. The purpose of a compiler is to reduce code written in a high level language to machine/assembly instructions. I think the AGC code was written in assenbly. I would look to some of the MIT docs as they were the key developers of the AGC | |
| Feb 4, 2022 at 13:38 | comment | added | J... | This answer is confusing. You're claiming you saw AGC code that was compiled using FORTRAN? Or that you worked on Apollo more generally and saw some FORTRAN code being used on the project elsewhere (ie: on mainframes, etc)? Are you aware of FORTRAN code being compiled specifically for the AGC? This seems to contradict other reliable sources... | |
| Feb 3, 2022 at 19:00 | comment | added | Robert Harvey | For performance reasons, rigorous numerical analysis in Python is almost always handed off to something else like a C program or SciPy. | |
| Feb 3, 2022 at 15:43 | comment | added | Edheldil | Also see Mariner 1 debacle ... arstechnica.com/civis/viewtopic.php?t=862715 :) | |
| Feb 3, 2022 at 15:31 | comment | added | John Doty | FORTRAN was the most common, but it was hardly universal. There were many languages around. In particular, JOVIAL was the language of choice for many embedded aerospace systems like this. FORTRAN, designed for heavy duty numerics, was not a good choice for embedded programming. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/JOVIAL | |
| Feb 3, 2022 at 9:01 | history | edited | Cornelis | CC BY-SA 4.0 | added link |
| Feb 3, 2022 at 3:51 | comment | added | zephyr0110 | Sir.. You worked on Apollo!!?? In that era? | |
| Feb 3, 2022 at 1:57 | history | edited | Fred | CC BY-SA 4.0 | Grammatical changes |
| Feb 3, 2022 at 0:14 | history | answered | tckosvic | CC BY-SA 4.0 |