Skip to main content

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

Required fields*

2
  • Michael - I've used both methods here and both return an object with 0 elements. object(SimpleXMLElement)#44 (0) { } -- I am not 100% sure why. I could use the standard object returned by the soap client, but SimpleXML makes it easier to loop through. Would something with the XML string cause this at all? Commented Sep 28, 2012 at 12:24
  • @RichardTestani I see - it's because of the soap namespace. See addition above. Commented Sep 28, 2012 at 12:52