Edit - Stack Overflow

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

Required fields*

Rev

11

What amazes me is that the official documentations cannot explain their stuff with this level of simplicity. I am not sure why they want to use a similar language lawyers usually use in terms and agreements stuff.

Tarik
– Tarik

2014-04-23 01:19:40 +00:00
Commented Apr 23, 2014 at 1:19
10

Richard E. Little has a very simple, nice example on his blog. It is really showing the problem of binary compatibility rather than that of source code compatibility, as illustrated in this answer (with the renamed method).

Yann-Gaël Guéhéneuc
– Yann-Gaël Guéhéneuc

2014-05-09 06:43:51 +00:00
Commented May 9, 2014 at 6:43
1

@Tarik which official documentation did you try that you can make such a bold statement?

Holger
– Holger

2022-02-01 11:42:37 +00:00
Commented Feb 1, 2022 at 11:42

Add a comment |

Correct minor typos or mistakes
Clarify meaning without changing it
Add related resources or links
Always respect the author’s intent
Don’t use edits to reply to the author

create code fences with backticks ` or tildes ~
```
like so
```
add language identifier to highlight code
```python
def function(foo):
print(foo)
```
put returns between paragraphs
for linebreak add 2 spaces at end
_italic_ or **bold**
indent code by 4 spaces
backtick escapes `like _so_`
quote by placing > at start of line
to make links (use https whenever possible)

<https://example.com>

[example](https://example.com)

<a href="https://example.com">example</a>

formatting help »
answering help »

Collectives™ on Stack Overflow