Return to Answer

I've solved this problem by changing this:

someNumber = someNumber.toFixed(2) 

...to this:

someNumber = +someNumber.toFixed(2); 

However this will convert the number to a string and parse it again, which will have a significant impact on performance. If you care about performance or type safety, check the the other questions as well.

I've solved this problem by changing this:

someNumber = someNumber.toFixed(2) 

...to this:

someNumber = +someNumber.toFixed(2); 

However this will convert the number to a string and parse it again, which will have a significant impact on performance. If you care about performance or type safety, check the the other answers as well.

I've solved this problem by changing this:

someNumber = someNumber.toFixed(2) 

...to this:

someNumber = (someNumber.toFixed(2))/1; 

I've solved this problem by changing this:

someNumber = someNumber.toFixed(2) 

...to this:

someNumber = +someNumber.toFixed(2); 

However this will convert the number to a string and parse it again, which will have a significant impact on performance. If you care about performance or type safety, check the the other questions as well.

I've solved this problem changing this:

someNumber = someNumber.toFixed(2) 

with this:

someNumber = (someNumber.toFixed(2))/1; 

Maybe could help someone!!

I've solved this problem by changing this:

someNumber = someNumber.toFixed(2) 

...to this:

someNumber = (someNumber.toFixed(2))/1;