Skip to main content

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

2
  • That's exactly what the OP said didn't work, since it accepts invalid dates like 33/19/2000. Commented Sep 12, 2013 at 0:46
  • @augurar Yes I could have made a more accurate one. But then again even the accepted solution could accept other formats not just dd/mm/yyyy. So I believe it wouldn't really matter now. Commented Sep 12, 2013 at 0:49