I hit upon this trying to figure out why you would use mode 'w+' versus 'w'. In the end, I just did some testing. I don't see much purpose for mode 'w+', as in both cases, the file is truncated to begin with. However, with the 'w+', you could read after writing by seeking back. If you tried any reading with 'w', it would throw an IOError. Reading without using seek with mode 'w+' isn't going to yield anything, since the file pointer will be after where you have written.

I hit upon this trying to figure out why you would use mode 'w+' versus 'w'. In the end, I just did some testing. I don't see much purpose for mode 'w+', as in both cases, the file is truncated to begin with. However, with the 'w+', you could read after writing by seeking back. If you tried any reading with 'w', it would raise an IOError. Reading without using seek with mode 'w+' isn't going to yield anything, since the file pointer will be after where you have written.

I hit upon this trying to figure out why you would use mode 'w+' versus 'w'. In the end, I just did some testing. I don't see much purpose for mode 'w+', as in both cases, the file is truncated to begin with. However, with the 'w+', you could read after writing by seeking back. If you tried any reading with 'w', it would throw an IOError. Reading without using seek with mode 'w+' isn't going to yield anything, since the file pointer will be after where you have written, and before you have written, the file has been truncated.

I hit upon this trying to figure out why you would use mode 'w+' versus 'w'. In the end, I just did some testing. I don't see much purpose for mode 'w+', as in both cases, the file is truncated to begin with. However, with the 'w+', you could read after writing by seeking back. If you tried any reading with 'w', it would throw an IOError. Reading without using seek with mode 'w+' isn't going to yield anything, since the file pointer will be after where you have written.