Skip to main content

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

1
  • 1
    I had the same idea today. It's roughly 3 times slower than switching on the type name. Of course slower is relative ( for 60,000,000 calls, only 4 seconds. ), and the code is so much more readable it's well worth it. Commented Nov 21, 2013 at 15:24