Skip to main content

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

Required fields*

2
  • 1
    We let the current job finish, and them we have some cases where we let the jobs in queue be cleaned-up if we have never ones (as suggested in the referenced question.) Don't like the idea of aborting already started jobs. Commented Nov 23, 2016 at 10:01
  • 9
    @MaTePe For situations such as automated testing of git branches, there is frequently little benefit to completing a test on a branch if the branch has been updated as the updates will need to be tested as well. The obvious solution is to abort the earlier test. Cleanup may still need to be done, but resources aren't wasted completing an unnecessary test. Commented Dec 5, 2017 at 17:23